review & discussion: “locked in time” February 24, 2010Posted by Katie in reviews.
Tags: mandy-katie book club, mystery
Hi, everyone! It’s time for another first-read/re-read challenge between me and Mandy from Edge of Seventeen! This time our selection is one of my favs — “Locked In Time” from Lois Duncan.
Here’s how the book club works. I’ve got a review, some questions Mandy and I emailed about, and at the end of the post is a chance to win your own copy of the book. Then, head over to Mandy’s post to see her review, the rest of our discussion and enter again to win a chance for the book!
Nore comes home after a year at boarding school following the death of her mother. But Louisiana isn’t really Nore’s home, it’s home to her father and his new family – stepmother Lisette, and stepsiblings Gabe and Josie. Her new family welcomes with what appears to be open arms…but it doesn’t take Nore long to start to suspect that something fishy is going on in the house around her – and more specifically, with her new step-family.
I went through a really big Lois Duncan phase when I was a tweenager. My library had only two little turnstile shelving units for teen books and I read all of them. Which meant I read every Lois Duncan, Lurlene McDaniel, and whatever Apple Paperbacks were on the shelves. I was probably too young for the books because I was always jumpy after reading a Lois Duncan book.
This book creeped me out so bad – I distinctly remember having nightmares about being buried alive. You can imagine that reading this book as an adult had me shaking my head about why I had been so scared. First of all, Nore is never buried alive! (She does spend some time in a cemetery though…which I might have chalked up to being buried.) The ending still wound up giving me the shivers because the climactic scene involves one of my worst fears ever and poor Nore has to experience it!
Even though the book didn’t scare me nearly as much, this time around I feel like I appreciated the book’s setting and descriptions more than I used to. I had actually forgotten that the book took place in Louisiana!
I love Nore as a character, she’s smart and doesn’t shrug off her suspicions. She’s got this minor superpower (always knowing what time it is) that winds up coming in handy quite a few times. Also, she only takes matters into her own hands when the adults in her life refuse to listen to her. Which is SO refreshing compared to what teens in books do now-a-days! (Yikes, I’m sounding old.)
Lisette is this totally old-fashioned, manners and etiquette mother and I remember rolling my eyes at her all the time. Still wound up doing that during this re-read. Gabe and Josie were much more tolerable than I remember! Especially Josie. But I wonder if that’s because I know the end of the book or because I’m an adult and can better sympathize with people.
I think my biggest complaint in this re-read is that the ending feels so tacked on and conclusion-y. It almost feels like an older Nore is writing the last chapter (which could be – because she does say that she’s writing down the story), but it actually drew me out of the plot and kind of jarred me. I wanted more falling action, I wanted to find out what happened immediately afterwards instead of years in the future.
All in all, this was definitely a good re-read. It didn’t make me as nervous, but I found new things to appreciate about the book. Now, Little Brown is updating some of Duncan’s books – I know “Killing Mr. Griffin” is the one that she’s working on now. I’d like to see this one updated (removing the cassette tapes!) so that it might get new life on a library shelf. Our mangled paperback copies still see circulation, so I know the teens are still reading.
Katie: What did you think of Josie as part of the story? (I feel almost as if her story is more interesting than Nore’s this re-read. I’d like to see a companion book written from Josie’s point of view, after this story takes place.)
Mandy: It’s neat; I could see Josie in Nore’s role if Nore wasn’t around. Josie is this ambiguous character who wants to do what her mom says because Lisette is a powerful woman, and at the same time Jo also wants to follow her own sense of what’s right. She’s trapped in that rebellious stage at thirteen.
I was surprised when Lisette first drugged Jo so she wouldn’t pitch a fit about Lisette’s actions. It’s when I first thought of Josie as being different than her mother and brother. Gabe didn’t fool me for a minute. But I was constantly surprised by Jo’s actions–I first thought she was just fickle in her affections, but then I realized that she really did have a bond with Nore.
My biggest question about Josie, when I finished the book was, why didn’t her story continue? I felt that it fell into this stagnant pattern after the events at Shadown Grove, and like you, I would have loved to see a sequel. I mean, Josie has this dramatic personality and she never really does anything with it. I’d have love to see her really break out.
Katie: Why do you think stepmothers/stepfamilies always wind up getting such a bad rap in books?
Mandy: I think stepmothers had a worse rap at the time this book was published, versus now. Now, throw a stone and you’ll find an extended family rooted through many step-family members. I have a stepson myself and my partner’s parents are separated so our family has a lot of branches. But I think this type of family network was less accepted even twenty years ago. When I was young, my friends always complained about their “stepmoms”. Maybe now we are more communicative about relationships in the family. I don’t know. I just feel a shift in teen fiction towards the stepmother/father being an okay person. Versus step-parents in teen fiction from the eighties and nineties, where they try to kill you in the book. I’m thinking of the great steps featured in books like King Dork by Frank Portman and Along for the Ride by Sarah Dessen.
But evil step-parents are a total trope in storytelling. Moreso the stepmother, I think. Who’s always jealous of your beauty and trying to kill you. Think apples and talking mirrors and housecleaning hardships. Interestingly, the opposite of the evil stepmother in storytelling is the fairy godmother, who’s more of an aunt figure.
Katie: What did you think of the town and the setting?
Mandy: The description in Locked in Time was very well done. It had all the sensations going for it, in the writing, and I loved this deep look into the setting of Shadow Grove.
I don’t think that the Town really sticks out in my mind because the characters didn’t really spend much time there.
My favourite scene, the one that sticks out the most, is the same one that was so powerful for you: the graveyard scene where Nore is hiding and playing that mental memory game with herself to pass the time. She tries to remember one memory from each year of her life, until she can get out of her hiding spot. She keeps it up to calm her nerves and settle her mind and I totally started this exercise too! Just like you. I think it’s kind of a neat thing to do.
But the way this scene is written in the book, I’m not surrpised it held so strongly in your imagination.
Katie: So, did this satisfy your craving for scary? Or did it border on just mildly creepy?
Mandy: It was creepy. Locked in Time creeped me out. But, if I had read this book when I was like twelve or so, I would have found the premise of a dangerous adult as your caregiver a truly frightening scenario. I mean, at that age you are dependent on your caregivers for almost everything. Imagine if one of them was evil and the other one was completely unaware? Chilling.
Both Mandy and I have a copy of the book to give away. Fill out the Google form to enter (all I need is a name and an email)! Twice the chance to win! Good Luck! (Giveaway ends March 10th.)
review & discussion: “double love” November 7, 2009Posted by Katie in features, reviews.
Tags: mandy-katie book club, sweet valley high
A special treat for you today! Mandy from Edge of Seventeen (who is beyond awesome and spent a ton of time on this with me) and I teamed up to do a re-read (me)/first-read (her) of “Sweet Valley High: Double Love.” And you get the bonus of reading our reviews, our interviews of each other, and entering two giveaways (one on my blog, one on Mandy’s) to win your own copy of “Double Love!”
Elizabeth and Jessica Wakefield are amazingly gorgeous, absolutely popular, perfect twins. The only difference between them is a beauty mark on Liz’s shoulder. Even though the girls are friends, there’s a certain amount of twin rivalry that comes through and in this first installment, it’s because of a boy named Todd Wilkins.
I grew up reading “Sweet Valley High.” I used to hole in the back of my library during the summer (we didn’t have air conditioning in Chicago…it was a long summer), pulling dozen of the books off the library turnstile racks and camping out until my mom dragged me home. These books were books about the cool girls, the girls that I longed to be as a “tween.” (I remember reading the series the summer between fifth and sixth grade. So I was eleven or so.)
It’s hard for me to critique something that I loved this much, something that is part of my childhood.
The book is a typical eighties series. It starts with the heavy handed introduction of the characters (raise your hand if you remember what size the Wakefield girls wore), builds into a typical drama that is easily resolved within the 180 pages, and is peppered with slang and pop cultural reference.
Even though the twins are close, they have a certain frenemies quality about them. Jessica sabotages Elizabeth while trying to get what she wants. But at the same time, the reader is sympathetic to Jessica — I remember feeling completely caught up in her desire to fit in and be popular. (My favorite twin was Elizabeth though. She wanted to be a writer! She had a typewriter! Of her own!)
The characterization is pretty typical. Jessica’s a popular cheerleader. Elizabeth (the more reserved twin) works on the newspaper and has the most prestigious column, the “Eyes and Ears” column which must remain anonymous. We have a kind of nerdy friend in Enid, the cute jock in Todd, the rich snob in Bruce, the rebellious bad boy in Rick, good guy (albeit geeky) in Win, and the town bad girl in Betsy.
Plot-wise, the book has plenty of drama — the twins fighting over Todd, the possible affair that their father is having, their brother’s mysterious appearances even though he’s at college, and the two most influential families fighting over the school’s football field. And of course, the first dance of the year.
Yes, the book is dated. I rolled my eyes several times at some of the language and situations, but I loved my stroll down memory lane.
However…I was curious about the revisions in the 2008 edition. So I read them both…if you loved Sweet Valley High as a teen back in the eighties/nineties, beware before picking up the re-released version. There are small subtle changes that make the story more modern, mostly pop culture things. No more tuxedo shirts; Jessica now loves halter tops. Rick Andover doesn’t whip Jessica off to Kelly’s for their first date…he takes her to an illegal drag racing highway. And our beloved Dairi Burger is now Casa del Sol.
Even though I missed the classic feeling of Sweet Valley, the book is modernized pretty well. Most of the original story is intact and I think it will find new readership, especially with the revamped covers. I just can’t wait until my teens find out these books were released before they were born!
(Katie) Let me start off by saying that I can’t believe that Jessica was your favorite twin! Gasp! How do you think teens now are going to respond to choosing between Jessica and Elizabeth? Are more teens going to pick Jessica because she’s more real? (I always thought Elizabeth was a bit too perfect and Jessica more the real twin.)
(Mandy) I know! Even as I was writing about Jessica being my favourite twin I was thinking “something is wrong here”. And it’s funny, while I was reading I kept thinking how twins would react to these two. Or how twins are portrayed. I read somewhere that Francine Pascal thought of J and E more as Jekyll/Hyde than two separate people. Which I totally see. Especially with Jessica just pretending to be Elizabeth all the time and people confusing them. It may be a stretch but that’s why I like the fact that one model was photographed twice to represent both girls on the updated cover art.
Jess DOES seem to be more real as a character. I was probably more like Liz when I was in high school so she seems too serious to me. I’m more like Jess now, although Rick Andover? Bleggh. No thanks.
(Katie) I’d never heard that before — about the twins being the same person, but like Jekyll/Hyde. That makes absolute perfect sense. And I like what you said about the cover model being used twice. I don’t think it’s too much a stretch.
I have a gut feeling that real twins probably wouldn’t relate to the Wakefields as a realistic portrayal of twins. But I’ll have to let you know later in life. My twin cousins are only one and a half! I would love to hear a twin’s perspective on the book.
Ha! Rick Andover is blechy. I don’t know what Jessica saw in him, especially since she could have any guy she wanted basically. (And she does…a lot.)
(Katie) Are the teens who read “Gossip Girl” and the like going to be able to relate to this world? (The updated version has a bit more drugs and drinking references, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near Gossip Girl level.)
(Mandy) I haven’t read Gossip Girl but I’ve seen the t.v. show (I heart Chuck Bass! *gasp* I really AM Jessica!). But no, SVH is not at the level of Gossip Girl. It is more quaint. Although, I did find the characterization of Jess and Liz was done well. I mean, Jess is written as a party girl who is conceited and selfish, she does some pretty terrible things to her sister, but she never comes off as evil. But she kind of is. Nobody would love growing up with Jess around, hogging the boys, kissin’ the guy you love and telling everyone you’re a slut. But we all knew or know girls like this. So the characters are relatable, I think, but some of the action in the book is more 90210 old-school rather than Gossip Girl.
I want to randomly add: what’s up with teen dramas that always include sub-plots of beloved parents having affairs? As a teen I didn’t really care what parents were up to and didn’t think them capable of these kinds of shenanigans. Hello, Walsh Twins!
(Katie) I know! I never wanted to think about my parents being in a relationship period. Other than, you know, staying together and sleeping in the same bed every night. I never even wanted to think about my parents as sexual creatures! An affair wasn’t even a possibility. If you asked me as a teen, the last time they had sex was when they conceived my younger sister. Eww.
(Katie) And you would know this one best — are the books actually being bought by teens? (Libraries still have the old editions, so the new ones aren’t really being purchased…or if they are, they’re getting tied to the old records so I can’t tell if they’re circulating in my system.)
(Mandy) I don’t actually know if they’re selling. I had to order the few copies we have at the store and we still have them. But, much of the selling of certain titles that happens at an independent bookstore happens because of hand-selling. Which I fully intend to do. I sold a few of the Babysitter’s Club graphic novel, the new BSC re-makes, and the new generation seemed to like them. Some data on SVH currently: Double Love the updated version is now in-stock at 20 locations in Canada and they sell 1-3 copies a month, on average. It’s not a huge bestseller, but not every book can be. This type of movement is alright, it shows that a new generation is interested in these stories again. I think they did a good enough job of the re-make.
(Katie) Excellent! I might go ahead and purchase a few of the re-released titles for my library. They are, after all, working on a SVH movie. And I’m not sure how I feel about that…nervous mostly.
(Katie) Was there anything that in the book that didn’t work for you — that seemed like teens today would scoff at because it’s too dated?
(Mandy) You know, not a lot. A few tiny things like Jess “fluffing” her hair before she enters a room. It made me think she had eighties teased hair. I’m not sure fluffy hair is in anymore. But they did a good job of having things like cell phones, laptops, blackberries. Just even referencing these items places the events in the book in a more contemporary time. Even though having this stuff doesn’t actually DO anything, plot-wise in the book. And when Todd phones for Liz at the beginning of the book he uses their landline, NOT a cell phone number. So there are still classic elements of the original.
(Katie) Good, I’m glad. I thought the update was successful, but I was worried that I might be placing too much nostalgia in the success. These were my childhood, after all!
(And yeah, I’m totally repeating this from Mandy’s blog, because I like uniformity. )